Brief Encounter (the David Lean film of 1945): A comparison">"Still Life" (the Noël Coward play of 1935) and Brief Encounter (the David Lean film of 1945): A comparison
- As is quite usual with films based on stage plays, the film shows most of the places which are only referred to (talked about) in the play (Dr. Lynn's flat, Laura's home, a cinema, a restaurant, Boots). Additionally, in the film, a number of scenes--both indoor and outdoor--have been added which are not even mentioned in the play (a scene on a lake in a rowing boat where Dr. Harvey gets his feet wet; Laura wandering about alone in the dark, sitting down on a park bench and smoking in public; a drive in the country in a borrowed car).
- Certain scenes are made less ambiguous and more dramatic in the film:
- In the film, the "explicit" scene where the two lovers are about to commit adultery is definitely toned down compared to the play (where it is left undecided, ambiguous, for the audience to decide whether they actually have sex or not). In the film, Laura has only just arrived at Dr. Lynn's flat when its owner comes home, and she is immediately led out by Dr. Harvey via the fire escape stairs.
- Something which is also made more dramatic and which does not remain ambiguous any longer in the filmed version is Laura's suicide attempt: Towards the end of both the play and the film, she wants to throw herself in front of an express train. In the film, her intention is confirmed by means of voice-over narration, but "she fails to take the Karenina way out and walks back to the buffet."(Frances Gray).
- Film language:
- There is quite a confusing flashback (or rather frame) in the film, with the ending of the story right at the beginning of the movie, which is then repeated at the end.
- In the film, there is voice-over narration (quite unnecessarily, one might argue), with Laura addressing her husband, or rather Laura imagining addressing her husband, in a dream-like state.
In her book Noël Coward (Macmillan, 1987), Frances Gray says that Brief Encounter is, "after the major comedies, the one work of Coward that almost everybody knows of and has probably seen; it has featured frequently on television and its viewing figures are invariably high. Its story is that of an unconsummated [sic!] affair between two married people. [...]
"Coward is keeping his lovers in check because he cannot handle the energies of a less inhibited love in a setting shorn of the wit and exotic flavour of his best comedies. [...] To look at the script, shorn of David Lean's beautiful camera work, deprived of an audience who would automatically approve of the final sacrifice, is to find oneself asking awkward questions. A disastrous attempt in 1975 to remake the film in a more up-to-date setting, with Richard Burton and Sophia Loren as Alec and Laura, made this plain." [pp.64-67]
Gray's main argument: Why don't they just go ahead and do it? Why do they feel guilty, watched and hunted all the time? They do not seem to be particularly religious, so what's the problem?
For Gray, it is a problem of class consciousness: The working classes can be and also act vulgar, and the upper class silly; but the middle class is or at least considers itself the moral backbone of society (and also has always been Coward's main audience!)--a notion whose validity Coward did not really want to question or jeopardize.
See Also: