History
The earliest fleeting reference to square roots of negative numbers
occurred in the work of the Greek mathematician and inventor
Heron of Alexandria in the 1st century AD, when he considered the volume of
an impossible frustum of a pyramid. They became more
prominent when in the 16th century closed formulas for the roots
of third and fourth degree polynomials were discovered by Italian
mathematicians (see Tartaglia, Cardano). It was soon realized that these formulas, even if one was only interested
in real solutions, sometimes required the manipulation of square roots of negative numbers. This was doubly
unsettling since not even negative numbers were considered to be on firm ground at the time.
The term "imaginary" for these
quantities was coined by René Descartes in
the 17th century
and was meant to be derogatory. The existence of complex numbers was
not completely accepted until the geometrical
interpretation (see below) had been described by Caspar Wessel in 1799; it was rediscovered
several years later and popularized by Carl Friedrich Gauss. The
formally correct definition using pairs of real numbers was given in
the 19th century.
Definition
Formally we may define complex numbers as ordered pairs of real numbers (a, b) together with the operations:
- (a, b) + (c, d) = (a + c, b + d)
- (a, b) · (c, d) = (ac - bd, bc + ad)
So defined, the complex numbers form a field, the complex number
field, denoted by C (or in blackboard bold).
We identify the real number a with the complex number (a, 0), and in this way the field of real numbers R becomes a subfield of C. The imaginary unit i is the complex number (0,1).
C could also be defined as the topological closure of algebraic numbers and the algebraic closure of R.
Geometry
A complex number can also be viewed as a point or a position vector on the two dimensional Cartesian coordinate system. This representation is sometimes called an Argand diagram. In the figure, we have
- z = x + iy = r (cos φ + i sin φ).
The latter expression is sometimes shorthanded as r cis φ, where r is called the absolute value of z and φ is called the complex argument of z.
However, Euler's formula states that ei φ = cisφ. The exponential form gives us a better insight then the shorthand rcisφ, which is almost never used in serious mathematical articles.
By simple trigonometric identities,
we see that
-
and that
Now the addition of two complex numbers is just the