Oralism vs. Manualism
There are two opposing perspectives on how to teach language to deaf people:
one is that deaf students should be taught primarily in sign language (manualism), the other is that deaf students should be taught primarily (or exclusively) to speak and lip-read (oralism).
The rationale behind the latter method is that deaf people will have to interact with hearing people most of the time, so they must learn to communicate as hearing people do.
The rationale behind the former method is that sign language is a natural form of communication while lip-reading and speaking are extremely difficult for those who cannot hear.
Those who prefer the sign-language method take the approach that spoken language should be used only as an auxiliary language.
In practice, deaf people have been observed to learn and communicate much faster and more fluently when taught in sign language than when taught orally.
In the U.S., the sign-language method was primarily used until 1880, when the second International Congress on the Education and Welfare of the Deaf (composed of 163 hearing and 1 deaf individuals) voted to use the oral approach to teach deaf students.
Part of the reason for the emphasis on oralism was the melting pot ideology, that everyone should share the same culture and speak the same language.
Also, because sign language was not recognized as a true language, it seemed deficient as a method of communication.
One of the major factors in changing public opinion was William Stokoe's findings, published in 1960, that American Sign Language was a true language.
The findings were not immediately accepted, but they played a major role in shifting the emphasis of teaching back to the sign-language method.
A growing movement in deaf education today is called bi-bi, which stands for bilingualism/biculturalism.
This method aims to both respect and foster Deaf cultural identity and sign language competence and to teach and encourage skills required to function in the dominant hearing culture.
The perception and education of Deaf people as a culture were revolutionized by the student strikes at Gallaudet University starting March 9, 1988. Deaf students were outraged at the selection of another in a line of university presidents who were hearing, finding it patronizing, marginalizing, and inappropriate for such an essential part of the Deaf community.
In less than a week of activism, the president-elect, who had also been criticized for malapropos statements about the functionality of Deaf people, resigned and a Deaf president replaced her.