Maoist theory
Unlike earlier forms of Marxism-Leninism in which the urban proletariat was seen as the only source of revolution, and the countryside was largely ignored, Maoism focused on the peasantry as a revolutionary force, which, it was theorised, could be mobilised by a Communist Party with "correct" ideas and leadership. The model for this was of course the Chinese Communist rural insurgency of the 1920s and 1930s, which eventually brought Mao to power. Furthermore, unlike other forms of Marxism-Leninism in which large scale industrial development was seen as a positive force, Maoism tended to distrust urban industrialisation in favor of distributed rural industrialisation (in the case of China) or active deindustrialisation, in the case of the Khmer Rouge regime. In both cases these policies proved impractical and indeed economically disastrous.
Although Mao Zedong Thought is still listed listed as one of the four cardinal principles of the People's Republic of China, the death of Mao and the rise of Deng saw a large relaxation in ideology. In the official ideology of the Communist Party of China, Maoism was necessary to break China free from its feudal past, but the actions of Mao are seen to have lead to excesses during the Cultural Revolution. The official view is that China has now reached an economic and political stage, known as the primary stage of socalism, in which China faces new and different problems completely unforseen by Mao, and as such the solutions that Mao advocated are no longer relevant to China's current conditions.
Mao himself is officially regarded as a great revolutionary leader for his role in fighting the Japanese and creating the People's Republic of China, but Maoism as implemented between 1959 and 1976 is recognised to have been an economic and political disaster. In Deng's day, supporters of radical Maoism was regarded as a form of "left deviationism" and being based on a cult of personality, although these errors were officially attributed to the Gang of Four rather than to Mao himself. Although, these ideological categories and disputes are less relevant at the start of the 21st century, these distinctions were very important in the early 1980's, when the Chinese government was faced with the dilemma of how to allow economic reform to proceed without destroying its own legitimacy, and many see Deng's success at starting Chinese economic reform was in large part due to his being able to justify those reforms within a Maoist framework.
Some historians outside of China today regard Maoism as an ideology devised by Mao as a pretext for his own quest for power. Most Chinese today regard the latter period of Mao's rule as having been a disaster for their country, and estimates of the number of deaths attributable to Mao's policies range into the tens of millions. At the same time,
even this disastrous period is largely seen as preferable to the chaos and turmoil that existed in China in the first half of the twentieth century, and among some people there is nostalgia for the idealism of revolutionary Maoism in contrast to the corruption and money-centeredness some see in current Chinese society.
In the west, Maoism is remembered as one of the more violent manifestations of the 1960s wave of student-led radicalism, and lingers on in the rhetoric of groups such as the Revolutionary Communist Party (USA). In some developing countries Maoist ideas still have some attraction to the more authoritarian wing of the radical movements. In general, Maoist movements outside of China are strongly opposed to the current Chinese government, who they see as having hopelessly strayed from the principles of Maoism.
See also: Quotations from Chairman Mao Zedong