Counterexamples
As you might guess from the generality of most of the examples above, it's actually harder to think of spaces that aren't paracompact than to think of spaces that are.
The most famous counterexample is the long line, which is a nonparacompact topological manifold.
(The long line is locally compact, but not second countable.)
Another counterexample is a product of uncountably many copies of an infinite discrete space.
Most mathematicians who use point set topology, rather than investigate it in its own right, regard nonparacompact spaces as pathological.
For example, manifolds are often (although not in Wikipedia) defined to be paracompact, thus allowing integration of differential forms to be defined as in the previous section, while excluding the long line, which is useless in almost every application.
Variations
There are several mild variations of the notion of paracompactness.
To define them, we first need to extend the list of terms above:
- Given a cover and a point, the star of the point in the cover is the union of all the sets in the cover that contain the point. In symbols, the star of x in U is U*(x) := ∪x∈U∈U U. (The notation for the star is not standardised in the literature, and this is just one possibility.)
- A star refinement of a cover of a space X is a new cover of the same space such that, given any point in the space, the star of the point in the new cover is a subset of some set in the old cover. In symbols, V is a star refinement of U iff, for any x ∈ X, for some U ∈ U, V*(x) ⊆ U.
- A cover of a space X is pointwise finite if every point of the space belongs to only finitely many sets in the cover. In symbols, U is pointwise finite iff, for any x ∈ X, the set {U ∈ U : x ∈ U} is finite.
A topological space X is metacompact if every open cover has an open pointwise finite refinement, and fully normal if every open cover has an open star refinement.
The adverb "countably" can be added to any of the adjectives "paracompact", "metacompact", and "fully normal" to make the requirement apply only to countable open covers.
As you might guess from the terminology, a fully normal space is normal.
Any space that is fully normal must be paracompact, and any space that is paracompact must be metacompact.
In fact, for Hausdorff spaces, paracompactness and full normality are equivalent.
Thus, a fully T4 space (that is, a fully normal space that is also T1; see Separation axioms) is the same thing as a paracompact Hausdorff space.