Free software vs. open source
Richard Stallman's political and moral pronouncements have made him a controversial figure. Many influential programmers who agree with the concept of sharing code disagree with Stallman's moral stance, personal philosophy, or the language he has used to describe his positions. One result of these disputes was the establishment of an alternative to the free software movement, the open source movement, whose aims are broadly similar, but whose proponents emphasize the practical benefits of copylefted code over the philosophical principles of liberty and freedom.
Few who have encountered Stallman or read his essays would deny that he is a man of deeply held (and readily expressed) convictions; this has been interpreted in both a positive and negative light. He has been the subject (some would say the instigator) of a number of widely-publicized flamewars on the Linux kernel mailing list, with Linus Torvalds, Larry McVoy, and other Bitkeeper advocates falling foul of his uncompromisingly anti-proprietary stance.
Additionally, Stallman has been accused of forcing the XEmacs fork of the EMACS project due to his requirement that nearly all copyright in GNU Emacs be signed over to the FSF. While doing so makes it easier for the FSF to enforce the GNU GPL in court, it also means that contributors (and possibly their employers) have to mail paperwork to the FSF, and that anonymous contributions cannot be used. XEmacs was an attempt to deal with these issues, which its developers saw as a political impediment to the technical task of improving Emacs.
Recognition
Stallman has received numerous prizes and awards for his work, amongst them:
References
See also
Bibliography
- Sam Williams (2002) Free as in Freedom: Richard Stallman's Crusade for Free Software, O'Reilly Press ISBN 0596002874 (also available over the web under the GFDL, see link below).
External links