Steiner Criticism
While some of the more practical sides of Steiner's teaching, like his architecture, have been received positively outside Anthroposophy itself, much of his more theoretical work has not. His philosophy has largely been seen by philosophers as already outdated when written, his "spiritual science", having a completely different basis from that of the modern scientific method, has been described as nothing more than vivid imagination being presented as factual truth. For example his idea that the main life process in the human body is the transformation of oxalic acid into formic acid, but "another formic acid than that produced in chemistry, which is dead; a living kind of formic acid", is considered completely untenable in modern biology and chemistry. His views of medicine are also seen as a kind of alchemy bordering on quackery.
The extremely high regard in which Steiner is held within Anthroposophy, which sees his thought as foundational and unsurmountable, to the exclusion of any other thinker, in contrast to the mainstream view of him as a rather minor figure of history, has prompted critics to see Steiner as a founder of a cult-like religion, not as a philosopher in the usual modern sense of the world. The Anthroposophist conviction that the next great civilization will be based on Steiner's thought is another hint towards the religious nature of the movement.
Steiner's views of Christianity, for example his view that Jesus was two children (one descended from Solomon, the other from Nathan) who somehow morphed into one person; that the "Christ Spirit" didn't enter Jesus until his baptism; that it had entered other people before; that Yahveh (Jehovah) dwells in the moon, but Elohim in the Sun; and some others are seen as heretical by pretty much all Christian Churches, except the Christian Community that Steiner himself founded within Anthroposophy.
Steiner's very positive view of many writings in the tradition of western occultism and alchemy, for example those of Hermes Trismegistos, the Kabbalah and Paracelsus, is also often criticised.
Steiner's racist statements, while certainly not the worst of their kind in 1920s Germany by a long road, have also drawn criticism, especially since many Anthroposophists still hold them up as true. His theory of the migration of humanity from Atlantis and of the "root races" with their successively higher evolutionary level in the order of African (which represents "the childhood of humanity"), East Asian (which "will never come up with ideas of their own"), Indian, Middle Eastern, Greco-Roman and Modern European, to be succeeded by a new race of re-incarnated Anthroposophists, and his ideas that "blondness actually confers intelligence", and that mixing of the races destroys the "clairvoyant ability", still forms the basis of history classes in the Waldorf schools to this day, although this is not often made explicit.
Waldorf has also been criticized as rather authoritarian; copying the teacher's writing from the blackboard is the main activity during standard lessons; the artistic development in the lower grades consists mostly of copying the teacher's artwork from the board; only certain colors are allowed for the children, and line drawing is considered unhealthy for children below 14 years of age. Free creative expression and spontaneity is not seen as being helpful for children, and, according to Steiner, is to be shunned in favor of discipline.
Selected bibliography
Amongst two dozen books, and over 6000 published lectures, some of the more significant works include:
- The Philosophy of Freedom (1894)
- Friedrich Nietzsche, Fighter for Freedom (1895)
- The Theory of Knowledge Implicit in Goethe's World-Conception (1886)
- The Education of a Child (1907) [Waldorf Education]
- Theosophy (1904)
- An Outline of Occult Science (1913)
- Four Mystery Dramas - The Soul's Awakening (1913)
External links