The Orthodox (Eastern and Oriental) Christopher
In contrast to the dramatic and miracle-laden stories popular among Roman Catholics who venerate St. Christopher, the story accepted among the Orthodox is somewhat more prosaic (albeit still with fantastic elements).
During the reign of the Emperor Decius, a man named Reprebus or Reprobus was captured in combat against tribes to the west of Egypt and was assigned to the numerus Marmaritarum or "Unit of the Marmaritae", so he was probably of that tribe. He was of enormous size and terrifying demeanor, being a cannibal with the head of a dog instead of a man (this was common to all the Marmaritae) Traditional Orthodox iconography depicts him as literally dog-headed. Nevertheless, he accepted baptism and began to preach the faith.
Eventually, the governor of Antioch or the Emperor, himself, decreed that he was to be executed for his faith. He miraculously survived many attempts at execution, eventually permitting himself to be martyred after converting multitudes. His body was then taken back to Alexandria by a "Peter of Attalia".
Historical Christopher?
The Western version of St. Christopher was ultimately repudiated by the Roman Catholic Church, as it was impossible to distinguish associated accounts from any number of probably fictional folk tales. Non-fantastic details of the Western Christopher's "life" were so scant as to be essentially non-extant.
This is not necessarily the case for St. Christopher as he is known in the east. While surviving Eastern accounts of his life are replete with miracles and events that do not mesh well with modern historiography, enough information has been preserved to present a possible account of a St. Christopher that would be amenable to modern historical sensibilities.
The first hurdle to consider is the idea that he was a dog-headed cannibal. This can be understood in the light that the surviving accounts of St. Christopher are contemporaneous. The practice of the time was to describe all people outside the "civilized" (Graeco-Roman-Persian) world as cannibals, dog-headed, or even more bizarre things, albeit often metaphorically. A later generation could then mistake a metaphor or hyperbole for a literal statement.
However, the man in question is also said to have been assigned to a military unit made up of Marmaritae. The Marmaritae were the independent tribes of Marmarica (now in modern Libya), who would have been pushed to the frontier region after Roman settlement. Since he was from a frontier tribe, describing him as being from the land of dog-headed people would have been a literary convention of the day.
The various miracles attributed to him in the Eastern stories could be explained as ordinary embroidering typical of Hagiography, especially regarding saints of the early centuries of Christianity.
Finally, we have the statements that he was killed in Antioch and his body taken elsewhere by a Bishop. There is no way he could have been killed in the fourth year of the Emperor Decius, who only reigned for two years. However, before ascending to the throne of the Eastern Roman Empire, Maximinus, was known as "Daza" before rising to power. Unfortunately, there is no record of a visit to Antioch by Maximinus in the fourth year of his reign (308). It is, of course, possible, that St. Christopher was executed in Antioch during this year by the order of a lower authority and personal trial before one of the Caesars is a later embellishment.
Unfortunately, none of this information permits identification of the actual man. Christopher is simply Greek for "Christ-bearer, and it refers, in the Eastern tradition, to St. Christopher's willingness to "take up the cross"--a common metaphor for converting to Christianity. Reprebus or Reprobus simply means "wicked person", so saying that Reprobus became Christopher amounts to saying "A wicked person became a Christian." Furthermore, no place claims to be the burial site of St. Christopher, very unusual for a martyr.
It has been speculated that St. Christopher could be the same man known as Saint Menas among the Copts, for whom a 4th century burial site is known but has no verifiable details about his life or martyrdom attached to him. However, there is no conclusive link.
External Links